Andreas,

I think what we have here is a snowballing series of overreactions.

I think a simple "hey, you forgot to mention my collaborator Brittany"
would've served your purpose a lot better than the "you insult me"
diatribe.

I think it's time to maybe take a breath and calm down. People here
are not out to piss you off. As most who responded have stated, they
like what you guys are doing.

It's a discussion group. If somebody - through fault of memory, not
malice - omits a credit here and there, someone else is always free to
jump in and correct them.

Without unnecessary vitriol.

Or with, I guess, if that's the way you roll.

I'm just saying it doesn't do anybody any good to make this unintended
slight a bigger deal than it is...

Chris

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cheryl, it is fine that you have other issues with me, us or the  
> manifesto, but I would like it if you could take a moment to reflect
on  
> what my issue is before jumping on to other things. First off Brittany  
> doesn't participate in this group - she quit it before you started  
> videoblogging. That is most likely the same reason why you have
received  
> any promotional materials or encouragement from her. I was on
Twitter back  
> when the lumieres started and I used that to promote the project.
Brittany  
> has pushed it in other circles. As I held your hand when you started
she  
> held others. You have read the manifesto: how could you think that we  
> would write a manifesto together if we were not both working on the  
> project? Is it surprising that I reacted? Would you not like it if
those  
> you work with make sure that you receive credit for what you do?
> 
> That is my one issue: Give credit where credit is due. It takes no
effort  
> at all to look up a name, but it means everything to that person. You  
> would not feel very good if you never received any acknowledgement
for the  
> work you've done on Show in a Box to grab one example. That is why I
see a  
> "bio" page coming on the SIAB website - so others know how to
acknowledge.  
> The fact that I'm closely involved in the lumiere videos means that
it was  
> a no-brainer for me to spot it this time, but it doesn't mean you can  
> ignore my request. Is it not a fair request to receive proper  
> acknowledgement for the work you do?
> 
> As for everything else:
> I am happy that Rox made a lumiere, at the same time we can't write
back  
> to everyone who makes one of those anymore. We had to stop when we
reached  
> a couple of hundred videos because it was taking too much time. You
must  
> understand that 425 lumiere videos have been made since you posted
your  
> last one. It was also clear that Rox hadn't seen the website as she
linked  
> to one of my blogposts instead of videoblogging.info (and there is a
clear  
> link to vb.info from that blogpost). I can't and won't take full
credit  
> for the lumiere project and that's why I had to write back in the
way I  
> did.
> 
> Regarding the manifesto:
> It's a manifesto for crying out loud! It's supposed to be strong and  
> without compromise to grab your attention and make you think about
what  
> you are creating, for whom and with what purpose. The fact that you
have  
> not removed your videos makes me think we were being too nice in
writing  
> it.
> 
> It's written as a reaction to the type of video and behaviour both
of us  
> were seeing and still are. It's an open disagreement and that's the
whole  
> point of writing a manifesto. To make the obvious comparison the
dogme95  
> manifesto was a reaction towards filmmaking as it was taking place
in the  
> 90s, the lumiere manifesto is a reaction towards the general state of  
> videoblogging. If you feel attacked by the manifesto, that's a good
thing,  
> you should. I feel attacked by it and I co-wrote it! It is unfortunate  
> that you did not go anywhere with your frustrations - the goal was
to make  
> you reflect on your practices rather than sit with a stiff upper lip
and  
> not react because you don't agree.
> 
> I personally don't have much patience with constant backpatting. There  
> needs to be constant challenge or we can't evolve (that goes in
general  
> and in regards to videoblogging). Sitting around in a circle  
> congratulating ourselves on how great everything is moves us
nowhere. It  
> is my responsibility and your responsibility to challenge the status
quo.  
> This forces us to think about where we are, where we want to be and
how we  
> can get there.
> 
> It is curious to me that the comments stating strong disagreement
with the  
> manifesto (in the "I don't want to participate anymore because the  
> manifesto is criticizing things I like" kind of way) have all
happened on  
> Twitter. They are spoken into a void using fragmented sentence in a
room  
> where it is impossible to carry a conversation (because all
arguments are  
> limited and each one is forgotten in a microsecond as it moves off the  
> page). At the same time those who have taken the manifesto as a
manifesto  
> and used it to look at themselves in a new way have all written
e-mails  
> (where it is possible to carry on a conversation). These people do not  
> agree with everything we say (just as I don't always agree with
everything  
> we say), but they are doing something constructive. Sam from patalab
is  
> one who has been involved in countless conversations and had the
following  
> to say about the lumiere project just last week:
> 
> "...the Lumiere project can be regarded as a beacon. It’s actual,  
> progressive potential for liberating “sight” might not have been
that  
> apparent when the project started. It probably was conceived more
out of  
> conceptual concerns, as an inoffensive game to play. But it seems to
be  
> one of the very few projects on the net - that I am aware of â€"
that might  
> have the inherent potential of actually re-installing a gaze of
freedom."
> 
> Regarding insults:
> I cannot choose not to be insulted when I read Rox's mail, just as you  
> cannot choose not to be insulted when you read the lumiere
manifesto. Our  
> actions have consequences and this time I chose to act on the
consequence  
> Rox's mail had on me. You chose not to react on the consequence the  
> manifesto has on you (though I wish you had).
> 
> - Andreas
> 
> PS. If you want to have your videos removed simply delete them from
your  
> website. We don't host any videos at all. We link to everything so
you are  
> 100% in control. I'm always sorry to see links go dead of course,
but it's  
> not my choice.
> 
> 
> Den 13.01.2008 kl. 11:49 skrev Cheryl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
> > You have *got* to be kidding, Andreas.
> >
> > When you and Brittany started getting into lumieres, the only person I
> > saw talk about them or promote them was you. It was you encouraging me
> > to try doing them. You picked up the ones I made without tagging them
> > properly, and gently taught me how to tag them if I wanted them to be
> > picked up for the lumiere showcase site. If I choose to relate those
> > facts of my personal experience, will I suddenly be a jerk for not
> > looking up Brittany's involvement and finding some way to mention it,
> > even though it's not what called my attention to lumiere video?
> >
> > Rox writes genuinely and lovingly about why she decided to try a
> > lumiere, and you could have chosen to comment in a positive way to
> > honor Brittany for her contributions and encourage Rox to continue to
> > experiment with the form. Instead you choose to be insulted, and tell
> > us that Brittany does, too (though surely she can speak for herself?).
> > You choose to answer negatively instead of positively.
> >
> > I started with lumieres because it was *fun*, and because of your
> > encouragement, and because some of Brittany's work was inspiring to
> > me, though I didn't know at the time she was your collaborator. The
> > second the manifesto appeared, I stopped, because it doesn't represent
> > my thoughts or feelings and I don't want to be associated with it. I
> > don't even want my work appearing on the same site with it! I didn't
> > say so publicly or ask you to remove links to the lumieres I made
> > because I didn't want to insult you and Brittany. I just decided to
> > quietly stop producing lumieres and let my actions speak for
> > themselves. But because you feel it necessary to treat Rox in this
> > manner, I think it's time to tell you the manifesto *does* put people
> > off, and suggest it as one possible reason lumiere video isn't getting
> > a lot of discussion in the group. You manage to suck all the fun out
> > of making them.
> >
> > If I've learned anything in the past 30 days, it's that I can't insult
> > you, Brittany or anyone else. No one can. You have to choose to feel
> > insulted. I recommend choosing something more fun to feel.
> >
> > Cheryl Colan
> >
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen"
> > <solitude@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Rox,
> >>
> >> I know the lumiere videos have not been discussed in this group (they
> >> don't have ads and there's no web 2.0 start-up involved, I
guess), but
> >> it's still not very nice not to give credit where credit is due.
> > Lumiere
> >> videos have been posted since May/June last year. Since the
> > beginning it
> >> has been a two-person effort where Brittany and I have been
> > collecting the
> >> videos, encouraging people to create the videos and writing our
> > reasoning
> >> for pushing these types of videos. That's why both our names are on
> > the
> >> front page of the website: http://videoblogging.info/
> >>
> >> You may think this is a small mistake and in the amount of letters
> > missing
> >>  from your email and blogpost it is. At the same time not doing this
> > very
> >> basic research and thus leaving out the name of half the people
> > behind the
> >> project is extremely discouraging to those left out. Over the past 8
> >> months Brittany and I have put in a large amount of work handling the
> >> lumiere videos and acknowledging my work, but not hers, is insulting
> > to
> >> both of us.
> >>
> >> The collection of lumiere videos currently consists of 548 videos
> > from 78
> >> different people. You can jump straight to the videos at
> >> http://videoblogging.info/lumiere/ If I must say so myself it is an
> >> amazing repository of creativity.
> >>
> >> - Andreas
> >>
> >> Den 11.01.2008 kl. 05:17 skrev Roxanne Darling <okekai@>:
> >>
> >> > A little public gushing here, I hope you all will indulge me. I
> > learned
> >> > about Lumiere from Rupert.
> >> > I finally made one today, and I want to thank you publicly,
> > Rupert, (and
> >> > Andreas too) for illuminating me about this art form.
> >> >
> >> >
> >
http://www.beachwalks.tv/2008/01/11/beach-walk-567-first-lumiere-for-rupert/
> >> >
> >> > Love,
> >> >
> >> > Rox
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> >> http://www.solitude.dk/
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
> http://www.solitude.dk/
>


Reply via email to