On 12/1/06, Matti Picus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I love gvim and use it at work on a Linux system with no connection to
the outside world. My coworkers laugh at copy-paste cycles that involve
<mark>ya <move>i<cntrl-x>" and <cntrl-x><cntrl-o> code completion, but I
consistently code-compile-debug faster than they can using eclipse.
I thought OK, let's setup vim to be more user friendly so I can do
advocacy. This led me to using cream.
I installed it (
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cream/cream-0-38-gvim-7-0-152.exe )
on a windows computer to test, but found cream and its installation of
vim both very slow to start up, on the order of 10s of seconds, about
the same time as a network timeout. Is this reasonable? Is there some
kind of "call home" in the startup files? A clean installation of vim
7.0 from source on the same machine does not have this problem.
You can try 'gvim.exe -V20/tmp/log' to identity points of slowness.
You might need timestamps in the logfile for that. To add timestamps,
you can try to redirect the logfile to the named pipe and the to
utility which adds timestamps.
Yakov
