On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:31:53 -0700, "Steve Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > From: Hari Krishna Dara, Tue, March 06, 2007 11:33 am > > and if we can enforce a fixed style on commenting such that the > > comments don't look like a mess. I would imagine that one needs to > > edit the tip to add their comment at the end, but it will be nice if > > the comment itself happens as a discussion (which appears as a > > discussion tab on the same page). > > I agree, is there any way the porting process can push comments to > each tip's respective discussion tab?
why don't we discuss that here: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Talk:Learning_the_vi_editor/Vim/TipsSandbox/Tip_1:_the_super_star :-) Seriously though, as I had mentioned on the discussion page, for me as a user of the tip, it is horribly counter-productive to go and read twenty-five thousands comments on a page. I'd much rather just read a "perfect" tip. This assumes, of course, that tip contributors care about me as a user. I hope they do :) Wikipedia model seems to work great. One page. All the information. Discussion on a separate page. One change: if it matters, we could reserve a line (or two) for a list of contributors. This information is available from the history page for those who care to look anyway, but maybe people care about their names being mentioned. Finally, on the subject of converting the comments - it is entirely a manual process, that can not be automated. Comments need to be integrated into the body of the main tip (maybe the tip needs to be adjusted, reworded, etc). We should just push out the existing pages, and then set to work on reworking the tips by hand. Eventually we'll be done. In any case, I think this will be an extremely useful resource (especially if we could then put VIM's documentation on there, and cross-link)
