John Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 写于 2007-03-22 12:43:51: > Thanks for the clarification Brett. At least if you have external > commands you use regularly though, you could wrap them in a vim > function, thereby making them effectively internal, making g< useful. > > Just an update - I promised I'd investigate extending my "patch" to > help those people who complained about losing their commands if they > pressed one too many keys. > I tried the most obvious approach, and whilst it sort of worked, > there was some unhandled complexity to do with reverting to "more- > prompt" mode which I couldn't easily work out. > I think it was because vim thought we had alreday exited "more- > prompt" mode, when in fact we shouldn't have (so you couldn't scroll > back up when you reached the end). > Since this g< command works somewhat (or can be made to work by > using a wrapper function for external commands), I think I might > give up on this and just be satisfied with the simpler "q exits the > Press Enter prompt" change. > Cheers, > John
Just done some experiment, if I use j/k or <up>/<down> to scroll within the "more-prompt" the message will never quit. Seems good but not quite useful to me since I always use "f"/"b" or <pgdn>/<pgup> to view the message. So the only issue is the lack of "f"/"b" or <PgDn><PgUp> support for the "more-prompt" and "hit-enter-prompt". key "f" and "b" is the standard page-scrolling key for less and more, it seems strange that the "more-prompt" and "hit-enter-prompt" do not have support the "f" and "b" key. Let's hope it will be available in future versions. -- Sincerely, Pan, Shi Zhu
