James McCoy wrote:
On Aug 21, 2013 1:42 PM, "Charles Campbell"
<charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov <mailto:charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov>> wrote:
>
> LCD 47 wrote:
>>
>> ..snip..
>>
>> +1 for this. People routinely edit files that only make sense
(and
>> will only ever run) on remote servers. There are legitimate situations
>> where editing a file has nothing to do with actually running it.
>>
> Except, if its embedded in vimscript, then it is intended to be
executed by vim.
But not necessarily *this* Vim, which is the point. The syntax is
valid regardless of whether this Vim has been built to execute the syntax.
Which again means: the writer of the script has no intention of testing
it at the current time. Bad idea.
Nonetheless, I've have posted a new version at my website and given a
copy to Bram several days ago.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
