On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Charles Campbell <charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov> wrote: > James McCoy wrote: > >> >> >> On Aug 21, 2013 1:42 PM, "Charles Campbell" <charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov >> <mailto:charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov>> wrote: >> > >> > LCD 47 wrote: >> >> >> >> ..snip.. >> >> >> >> +1 for this. People routinely edit files that only make sense >> >> (and >> >> will only ever run) on remote servers. There are legitimate situations >> >> where editing a file has nothing to do with actually running it. >> >> >> > Except, if its embedded in vimscript, then it is intended to be executed >> > by vim. >> >> But not necessarily *this* Vim, which is the point. The syntax is valid >> regardless of whether this Vim has been built to execute the syntax. >> >> > Which again means: the writer of the script has no intention of testing it > at the current time. Bad idea.
Which again is not if someone asks you for a quick review of the code. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
