On 14/11/13 17:39, Jürgen Krämer wrote:
[…]
the @@ lines look suspicious to me. I thought they should start with @@,
contain the old and new range of the hunk and end with @@. But in this
patch @@ does not end the line; the line still contains some text that
might be the line from before the hunk.
Regards,
Jürgen
IIUC, in a "git-style" diff, that's the name of the "function"
containing the hunk — the function name as guessed by the git diff or hg
diff command, and that doesn't always make sense for a programmer of
whichever language the file is in.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
44. Your friends no longer send you e-mail...they just log on to your IRC
channel.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
