On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Kazunobu Kuriyama < kazunobu.kuriy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It may be true that setting go+=M will reduce memory usage and make > startup faster. But I would say the benefit gained by doing that is quite > marginal. > It makes a noticeable difference to me. That's part of why I do it. > Hence, in comparison with those heavy tasks, what is gained by go+=M is > negligible. > That's not the only reason someone would want to disable the system menus. Some users just don't want to stare at all that garbage. It's the *same* justification for the existence of *tons* of other options. I disable the system menu.vim so that I can source my own custom version that's very bare-bones. It doesn't cause a noticeable speedup and my screen is uncluttered. Thus the gain by having go+=M is not negligible. > I don't understand why go+=M is so important for some people. > I don't understand why suddenly having a system vimrc after years with none is so important for some people. Nor do I understand why, if we're going to have one, some people are so desperate that "syntax on" and "filetype blah" be in it. Is it that important to be able to delete one or two lines that are proably already in your vimrc? -Manny -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
