Mr. Shawn H. Corey escribió: > On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 02:00 +0100, Jesus Sanchez wrote: > >> o Colors are better identified with black backgrounds when the >> differences are few. >> >> > > Colours are better identified if they are surround by other colours. > Human have colour invariance. This means colours are adjusted so an > item that is partly in the sun and partly in shade will look like it has > the same colour throughout. It also makes it hard to see true colour. > For example, the colour of black on a LCD monitor is actually a dark > grey. The only way you can see this is have it powered on but with > every pixel as black. If a small patch is not black, then the illusion > kicks in and the rest of the screen looks black. > > What colours you see depend on what colour the object is, the lighting, > and what are the colours of nearby objects. > > > yeah, very precise information but I think I didn't explained myself right in that point.
When I said colors are better identified with black backgrounds I was trying to say that if you put a black square, inside that scuare you put two lines of 1 pixel width. One line is a pure red and other line is a little modification of pure red (for example #ee0011) it's easier to see the difference than if the background were white. Anyway you explained very well something I didn't knew. -Jesus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
