On Jan 2, 4:39 am, Anthony Campbell <a...@acampbell.org.uk> wrote:
> A principal grouse of people who prefer other editors is that vim is
> modal. This doesn't actually bother me,

I like Vim in part *because* it is modal. I have trouble in non-modal
editors learning all the keyboard shortcuts partially because it is
usually simpler just to reach for the mouse. And, I find that having
specific "modes" that you edit in more closely mirrors how I think
about my tasks...I need to move some text here, delete that text,
change the text of a function, etc. which can all be viewed as
separate commands, and it makes sense to have one mode from which you
can accomplish all of them, and then return to. The ability to use the
entire keyboard for quick access to common commands is genius and
would be difficult to accomplish without a separate command/normal
mode. I remember reading someone likening Vim's normal mode to a video-
game controller with a few dozen buttons. The keys are all set up for
rapid access to common tasks, and entering text, etc. requires that
you enter a different mode.

-- 
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

Reply via email to