On 8 April 2011 07:58, John Beckett <johnb.beck...@gmail.com> wrote: […] > whatever the merits, this is one of those situations where it > is not worth debating about some theoretical benefit of being > able to use vim.org without your browser deciding that it > doesn't work, so it should try www.vim.org instead.
If you're averse to the theoretical, what about the practical? elinks 'http://vim.org/' — fails. lynx 'http://vim.org/' — fails. links2 'http://vim.org/' — fails. w3m 'http://vim.org/' — fails. wget 'http://vim.org/' — fails. vim 'http://vim.org/' — fails! A user may well assume the site is down if the url doesn't resolve. H. -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
