Quite subjectively: the audio quality is usually good, and therefore
Jabber is mostly useful to "channel in" the remote participants. Asking
the Jabber scribe to also summarize what people are saying is putting
too high a burden on the scribe, while also hurting both the scribe's
and the remote participants' ability to concentrate on what's being said.
And to anticipate Melinda's obvious response: when the audio quality is
very poor I just give up. It's incredibly hard for a remote participant
to gain anything from such a meeting.
Thanks,
Yaron
On 03/28/2012 07:07 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 3/28/12 7:59 AM, George, Wes wrote:
Do we have to write a formal BCP? I'd rather something shorter
> without all the boilerplate, but I'm not sure if there's a
> method to do that.
I hope that we haven't reached the point as an organization where we
need BCPs or other formal documents to describe everything we do or
need. I'll start a page on the chairs wiki.
Melinda
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
