There's potential use there at either the code sprint or hackathon. I could see how some either team could definitely include remote participants.
Tony On 4/10/16, 9:27 AM, "vmeet on behalf of cho...@chopps.org" <vmeet-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > >Dan York <y...@isoc.org> writes: >> John, >>> Serious debugging _during_ IETF-week really doesn't make sense; >>> but we ought to do it >> >> I agree... BUT... I wonder if we can actually replicate the necessary >> conditions outside of during an actual IETF week. It seems to me the loads >> on the Meetecho servers and network may only be possible during an event >> week... But there may be other ways to add load. > >Perhaps if there was an announced testing/debugging sessions on Fri or >Sat prior we could get a lot of people to join. Friday would be best b/c >people then could be at work (possibly) replicating what their actual >experience would be the following week, but that might be too early >for the IETF on-site end of things. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html. https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet