> Hmmm... yes. I can't see any way around it unless cookies are used.
which is a bit tricky but maybe possible
> The user could be asked if they want to download a tiny (a few k) applet
> that would enable them to keep their own cache of info locally on their
> machine.
the applet security model *should* prevent this...
no access to local files by applets
just applications
> Hmmm... your categories and mine are the same, just using
> different words I think. What you are talking about is having
> a variety of aspects to ownership that may be shared with
> trusted people.
egg-zactly
> there are as many levels as there are flaggable capabilities worth
sharing.
> - Building and deleting objects (modify database) -- 2 functions really
> - booting someone off
> - start/stop system
> - ignoring others (all should be able to do this)
> - entry to certain restricted areas (useful for X-rated wrls you don't
> want kids or politicians to see)
hmmmmm
hadn't thought of that one...
although come to think of it
makes sense
jeffs
--
Jeff Sonstein
Assistant Professor
Department of Information Technology
Rochester Institute of Technology
----------------------------------------
http://ariadne.iz.net/
http://www.it.rit.edu/~jxs/
http://ariadne.iz.net/~jeffs/jeffs.asc
----------------------------------------
There are no bugs,
there are just undocumented features
