At some point, some ruling body had said those stickers were non-compliant and meaningless. So I think the assumption is that they still see it that way. I think it was the FCC, but not sure. I think to them if it's on a desk and is shaped like a phone, it better work properly for 911.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:48 PM Pete Mundy <p...@fiberphone.co.nz> wrote: > > I guess different people have different interpretation of that wording :) > > To me it seems UNreasonable to assume that a phone or device with a > sticker on it that says "This phone does not work for emergency calls" can > call emergency services. > > > > On 24/01/2020, at 6:46 AM, Carlos Alvarez <caalva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I believe that the stickers on home phones may not really cover the > liability. The wording is something like: A phone or device that a person > would reasonably assume can call emergency services." So the softphone is > obviously different, but a physical phone at home seems like it must still > work properly. > _______________________________________________ > VoiceOps mailing list > VoiceOps@voiceops.org > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops >
_______________________________________________ VoiceOps mailing list VoiceOps@voiceops.org https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops