I'm not sure if Axil gets credit for first bringing up graphene, but I've often wondered if there weren't a role for it in either the macro- or nano- structure of a device. BTW, graphene can be 3d printed on regular machines, while alumina can be 2d printed (with some difficulty I believe) on laser lithography type 3d printers. ken
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Eric-- > > Also keep in mind the physics student, Carl-Oscar Gullstrom, at the > Uppsala University and under one of the Lugano authors, has a theory that > is similar to Robin's idea. Its worth reviewing. > > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/244393652/Low-radiation-fusion-through-bound-neutron-tunneling > > Bob > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Eric Walker <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Saturday, January 03, 2015 10:16 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Sealing the Dog Bone > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > It may be that the hydrogen only acts to help distribute the Li-7 to the >> Ni isotopes for the Li-7+Ni reactions Jones suggested back in October and >> Eric has just reviewed. > > > Just a small correction. It was Robin that suggested that what was going > on was a chain of 7Li(Ni,Ni)6Li neutron-stripping reactions. This is a > suggestion that I'm still partial to. Unless there has been an error in my > analysis, I'm inclined to think the percentage of lithium reported in the > 2mg sample from the Lugano assay was unrepresentative of the percentage of > lithium in the total charge by a factor of 10-20. Admittedly, this is a > heavy strike against the proposed involvement of 7Li, all else being equal. > > Most advances in technology are based on a mixture of trial and error >> work and application of half-baked theory. They go hand in hand. > > > Nice summary. > > Eric > >
