Nice work Jeff,
You have made Mills more accessible, but I’m not sure he would agree with everything that you have done here, due to the implications. This is also very similar to what Michaud is showing – with the huge emphasis on 511 keV value, which permeates the entire field of LENR… kinda’ like the smile of the Cheshire cat… and it is all tied into Hotson/Dirac and the epo field. And although you state: the “Transition State Orbitsphere” (TSO) is created at orbit state n= alpha = 1/137.036 (i.e. FSC or fine structure constant … where matter and energy are indistinguishable by any physical property” according to [Mills] … yet, for some strange reason you stop there, instead of actually identifying and analyzing that precise mass-energy state as being relevant in itself – such as the end product of “shrinkage”. To cut to the chase, when you multiply this fundamental value of electron or positron mass (511 keV) by alpha (along with a relativistic correction) the result is essentially the same as the mass-energy signature of the DDL – which is equivalent to dark matter (and is unlike Mills’ actual prediction). The actual value as it is showing in dozens of cosmological papers, appears to be 3.56 keV as opposed to 3.73 keV, which difference is the relativistic correction. Are you unaware of the cosmology papers behind this? They can only serve to boost your case. If this 3.56 keV value is indeed the end of the road for ground state hydrogen redundancy, then it should be the most important value in all of physics, since it would explain dark matter as an isomer of hydrogen – which is most of the mass of the visible Universe, so why not most of the mass of the invisible? … yet everyone in LENR appears to be avoiding cosmology like the plague. I hope that is not because it goes back to Dirac and not to Mills, but of course – the similarity could all be a “coincidence”. Yet, since this particular value is the hottest topic in cosmology these days, it is a mystery why observers here on vortex avoid connecting real observation in another field with theory - to explain LENR as the energetic creation of dark matter, and not a nuclear reaction. In the eyes of the mainstream, if the 3.56 keV x-ray is verified in experiment, the field could change almost overnight from “pathological” to “cutting edge”… From: Jeff Driscoll take a look at Appendix 2 starting on page 62 of this, it is very similar to what you did: http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20150105175045/blacklightpower/images/3/33/BLP-e-long-1-5-2015.pdf this comes from the "summary" of pair production on this page http://blacklightpower.wikia.com/wiki/Pair_Production the website is a wikia for Blacklight Power's theory, On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 11:02 PM, Lane Davis <seattle.tr...@gmail.com> wrote: I just released a new paper on modeling the Atom and photon as a capacitor and producing the correct energy levels. This work corresponds perfectly to Andre Michaud's paper which was also released the same day. Turns out that we had been working on similar equations with the photon, although he had never formulated the ground state energy of hydrogen like I did. Frank Znidarsic's model is also closely related to this. Here is a link to my paper, as well as Andre's. I had never spoken to him before the day both our papers were released. YouTube video explaining the paper here: http://youtu.be/PSsVI53auAI My Paper: http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5862 Andre's: http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5789 Let me know what you think if you read it. Lane -- Jeff Driscoll 617-290-1998
