From: Jeff Driscoll
Ø I wouldn't focus too much on the TSO being the end point of shrinkage - it's more the birth of the electron in pair production. All the GUTCP "rules" or "postulates" produce nice clean equations that show the TSO being the birth… Well – if you want to believe that Mills got everything right – then that might be true, but I do not buy it due to the litany of failures, glossed over as if they never happened. Another valid perspective is that “America’s genius” missed quite a very of the more important details which explain anomalous heat from hydrogen, and that he did not get everything right. If he had, BLP would not have suffered through the dozens of disappointments over the last 24 years in getting a product to market. He is further away now than ever. An immediate commercial product is something that Parkhamov’s experiment could stimulate this year, assuming it will be quickly replicated… and why not assume that, since it took him only weeks to pull it off. But the main thing that Mills did foresee, and perhaps he deserves the “big prize” for it (once it is proved beyond doubt) - is simply that the electron of a hydrogen atom can become stable in a redundant ground state. Once that is accepted – it implies that ONLY the lowest of these redundant states is going to be the stable end-point, and since this ultimate stable state corresponds to the recent cosmological findings of dark matter – DDL, it all adds up to the possibility that Mills is partly right and partly wrong. Jones
