I searched a little in the literature about these "hydrinos", They seams to originate from the wave operator, people have found them in simple wave equations. Both Maxwell's equations, the Dirac equation etc contains the wave operator. What is interesting is that if you assume that the proton have a spatial distribution, these hydrino states goes away, showing that the DIrac equation does not handle the local area of the protón especially well or is sensitive. I don't know if this result is correct math, but this could indicate that Maxwells equations + nonradiativity is the king because I don't expect the solutions for this system to brake that easy e.g. Mills hydrinos would prevail. This indicates the difference between Dirac and QED compared to Mills and GUTCP.
Regards On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Roarty, Francis X < francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > Good time to inject again the 2005 Jan Naudts paper re relativistic > hydrogen which if correct means the redundant state is a relativistic > perspective induced by surrounding Casimir geometry that restricts the > vacuum density. Locally there is no redundant state just Lorentzian > contraction and time dilation via warping instead of near C displacement. > > Fran > > > > *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] > *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2015 3:50 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Calculating the Energy of an atom using the > equation for an isolated conducting sphere. > > > > *From:* Jeff Driscoll > > > > Ø I wouldn't focus too much on the TSO being the end point of shrinkage > - it's more the birth of the electron in pair production. All the GUTCP > "rules" or "postulates" produce nice clean equations that show the TSO > being the birth… > > > > Well – if you want to believe that Mills got everything right – then that > might be true, but I do not buy it due to the litany of failures, glossed > over as if they never happened. > > > > Another valid perspective is that “America’s genius” missed quite a very > of the more important details which explain anomalous heat from hydrogen, > and that he did not get everything right. If he had, BLP would not have > suffered through the dozens of disappointments over the last 24 years in > getting a product to market. He is further away now than ever. > > > > An immediate commercial product is something that Parkhamov’s experiment > could stimulate this year, assuming it will be quickly replicated… and why > not assume that, since it took him only weeks to pull it off. > > > > But the main thing that Mills did foresee, and perhaps he deserves the > “big prize” for it (once it is proved beyond doubt) - is simply that the > electron of a hydrogen atom can become stable in a redundant ground state. > > > > Once that is accepted – it implies that ONLY the lowest of these redundant > states is going to be the stable end-point, and since this ultimate stable > state corresponds to the recent cosmological findings of dark matter – DDL, > it all adds up to the possibility that Mills is partly right and partly > wrong. > > > > Jones >
