Good point about the delays, is there a good explanation for the different delays for the two sources 52ns for protium and 26 ns deuterium? Interesting that protium takes exactly twice as long and is half the mass. I appreciate the +/- kaon half life is about 12ns.
> On 26 Oct 2015, at 15:13, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Holmlid says that the the reaction is delayed by 26ns for deuterium and 52 ns > for protium. This means that the reaction is produced by a decay product of > the K mesons. The 10 billion kaons are produced simultaneously. Positrons are > seen but no gamma. This is important. This means that the mechanism that > suppresses of thermalizes the gamma radiation exists AFTER the hydrogen > Rydberg matter is blasted apart. The Rydberg matter is not causative. > > This also means that more electrons are seen then positions like what > happened in the big bang in respect to CPT violation. Positrons were seen a > long distance away from the site of the reactions. This means that the gamma > thermalization extends outward meters from the site of the reaction. > > How long does it take to reenergize this process? How long do we need to wait > before another laser shot produces similar results. Both Mills and Papp were > able to repeat their reaction is milliseconds. Can Holmlid do the same? Does > this reaction still need hydrogen Rydberg matter to exist after the first > laser shot? Holmlid said that it takes weeks to build up the Rydberg matter. > But both Mills and Papp got repeatable results in milliseconds. Does this > mean that the case of the reaction persists to thermalize radiation and > stabilize radioactive isotopes long after the Rydberg matter is gone? > > We are at a stage in LENR where Niels Bohr was doing his exploration of the > structure of the atom. Holmlid needs to modify his experimental processes to > get as much info out of his experiment as he can. > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> Well if Kaons are present on the up side we always thought something strange >> was going on in this process😉. >> >> Although energetically there is enough rest mass in Deuterium to produce a >> Kaon through some kind of low energy or collective trigger for the nucleons >> to trigger can it account for the formation of these quarks? >> >> If it is not possible this way but on the other hand they are present it >> would indicate maybe that the right combination of quarks and anti quarks >> are produced to form all the mesons observed from high energy excitation in >> one place. >> >> This I think is consistent with your SPP analogue black hole Hadron >> evaporation idea? >> >> As an alternative approach to the analogue black hole idea, for a meson to >> form in a single bound place I suppose that meson combinations could be >> generated in a nucleus. If a nucleus somehow has enough extra energy to >> generate a quark neutral over all combination of mesons. I wonder if this >> also true if a nucleon or nucleon pair is destroyed in the process. As well >> as an energizing source (perhaps a laser, phonon resonance effect or >> magnetic stimulation from SPP), I suppose a nucleus of sufficient binding >> energy would be required. It seems Deuterium it self does not have any where >> near the binding energy to hold a pion let alone combinations of pions or >> kaons. So if a single nucleus is required to generate complete mesons this >> implies heavier nuclei are required at least of sufficient binding energy to >> hold a meson pair before being released from or quantum tunneling out of the >> nucleus. >> >> If we assume 8MeV binding energy per nucleon then perhaps we need a nucleus >> of atomic mass of 36 (heavier than Sulphur) to manifest +/- pion pairs for >> example. For kaon pairs however, much heavier nuclei would be implicated. >> I'm not sure if these are present in the fuel but I suppose platinum would >> be heavy enough. >> >> So perhaps as I think you have said in the past the UDD is providing a kind >> of magnetic resonance to other individual nuclei. If these are heavier >> nuclei perhaps they can be excited to a state where these meson pairs can be >> manifested. >> >> If the accumulation of energy in the nucleus is slow perhaps the mesons >> would be ejected as soon as the are formed with minimal energy as soon they >> can tunnel out of the nucleus. I suppose - mesons would form pionic and >> kaonic atoms and maybe the + pion interact with a neutron to form a proton, >> otherwise they would decay following the chain mentioned by Holmlid. >> >> It might be still difficult to account for Kaons using the above approach if >> so we are left with: >> >> Nucleon or nucleon pair disintegration,(perhaps in ultra dense material) >> then a trigger needs to be identified. >> >> Nucleon annihilation followed by particle generation from the energy >> released. >> >> Axils SSP black hole analogue and Hadron evaporation. >> >> High energy nucleon impacts or fusion events. In which case we would expect >> more radiation if I understand correctly. >> >>> On 26 Oct 2015, at 08:03, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> K−, negatively charged (containing a strange quark and an up antiquark) has >>> mass 493.667±0.013 MeV and mean lifetime (1.2384±0.0024)×10−8 s. >>> K+ (antiparticle of above) positively charged (containing an up quark and a >>> strange antiquark) must (by CPT invariance) have mass and lifetime equal to >>> that of K−. >>> >>> The mass difference is 0.032±0.090 MeV, consistent with zero. The >>> difference in lifetime is (0.11±0.09)×10−8 s. What's weird is that two >>> different quarks types are produced out of nothing. You just don't find >>> strange quarks in ordinary matter. >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> in physical cosmology, baryogenesis is the generic term for the >>>> hypothetical physical processes that produced an asymmetry(imbalance) >>>> between baryons and antibaryons produced in the very early universe. The >>>> baryonic matter that remains today, following the baryonic-antibaryonic >>>> matter annihilation, makes up the universe. >>>> >>>> LENR could be responsible for the past and ongoing production of matter in >>>> the universe in violation of CPT and that negative matter (antibaryons) is >>>> being sent back in time. >>>> >>>> We see excess electrons pop into existence in LENR reactions. Could LENR >>>> be the GOD reaction? In point of fact, Holmlid is producing electrons from >>>> nothing in his experiment. Don't get excited, we are just talking here. >>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> CPT THEOREM C(harge) -P(arity=reflection) -T(ime reversal) INVARIANCE is >>>>> a property of any quantum field theory in Flat space times which >>>>> respects: (i) Locality, (ii) Unitarity and (iii) Lorentz Symmetry. >>>>> >>>>> Holmlid is producing neutral K mesons. This particle demonstrates CP >>>>> violation, >>>>> >>>>> The discovery of CP violation in 1964 in the decays of neutral kaons >>>>> resulted in the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1980 for its discoverers James >>>>> Croninand Val Fitch. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CP_violation >>>>> >>>>> Who can say why LENR produces neutral K mesons? >
