Axil, is it possible that you are jumping to wrong conclusions? When observations do not seem to add up, it is time to prove that they are in fact valid. I think we need at least a replication of these results before we go way out on a limb trying to explain something that might not be happening at all.
It is fun to offer speculations but it is too easy to run off on a tangent without the proper proof that the effect is real. Do you have total confidence in what Holmlid is reporting? I remain skeptical. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Oct 26, 2015 11:03 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT The LENR reaction effect are long range with the detector being 3 meters for the source of the reaction. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: The reaction changes based on the color of the filter that is used on the laser. The time to change the filter is 60 seconds. This means that the Hydrogen rydberg matter is long gone on the second and third laser shot. When Cs137 is used as a probe. the reaction produces a spike in the beta decay as send in stabilization of radioactive isotopes seen in many other LENR experiments. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: The delay or 12, 26, and 52 ns means that the kaons appear before any other particles are produced. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: Wait a minute – the end result of muon decay is an electron (or positron in the case of the antimuon). This is technically not “beta decay” at least not as taught by pedantics. Beta decay is defined as a type of radioactive decay in which a proton is transformed into a neutron, or vice versa, which doesn’t happen in muon decay. Anyway, muon decay produces three particles, which includes an electron or positron (same charge as the muon) and two neutrinos. The neutrinos essentially are lost to the reaction. Since Holmlid says copious muons are created from proton or neutron disintegration, which muons decay in microseconds, then copious positrons and electrons are formed … but not “from nothing”… the electrons come from muon decay. According to Bob Higgins, the positrons do no annihilate, but if you are looking for the source of electrons, it is from muon decay following nucleon disintegration. From: Eric Walker Axil Axil wrote: In point of fact, Holmlid is producing electrons from nothing in his experiment. Don't get excited, we are just talking here. If one applies straightforward logic, there are only three possibilities: · Baryogenesis and tachyons are creating the electrons. · Gorrillas are creating the electrons. · Beta decay is creating the electrons. Eric
