Good point. That's very true too. Those people at the frontier of experimentation like Holmlid and putting together new knowledge in new and novel ways like yourself Axil are rare individual and way ahead of most of us. I agree we should not hold them back with the burden of external verification and should trust to some extent their expertise. Its up to others in time to learn test and validate and that additional external verification will come. Positive or negative when it comes we will always learn and gain something in the process.
I like the image of experts being generated out of a vacuum 😀. Perhaps this is indeed the secret source of LERN get positive and negative experts generated in equal proportion and allow them annihilate to in a big ball of energy? I can only imagine what quantities of experts are eventually produced by tachyons but if the positive ones are ejected into the world and the negative ones are trapped in a black hole and sent back in time so much the better 😉 > On 28 Oct 2015, at 02:19, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think that there are experts in particles created in condensed matter > physics. Holmlid is the first. We can't wait for experts to develop out of > the vacuum. > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> Yup with due respect to Holmlid who obviously has good well developed >> expertise in the field and years of experience and analysis behind him, we >> nevertheless cannot know for sure until other experts are brought in to >> witness and process the raw data and ideally the test is repeated >> independently. I'm fully with you there Eric. I hope we get that >> verification someday. >> >>> On 28 okt. 2015, at 01:05, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Cooke >>>> <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> The alternatives are also hard to explain, however: >>> >>> There is another alternative you didn't mention -- Holmlid has a fertile >>> imagination and is confused and needs to pull in someone who knows how to >>> measure charged particle radiation. >>> >>> Eric >