A 60 inch world war 2 search light produces 800,000,000 candle power while consuming 78 volts and 150 amps. How many candle power does the SunCell produce for comparison?
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is just a story about technical development and I do find it to be a > credible process of such and I enjoyed the story leading to the final design > for which I agree that if the COP is high will lead to a success. Now > Mills clearly show no need to prove to the public that it works. It do > sound like > he quite like to be under the radar and put in the fringe corner as long > as the dollars roll in and that they can finish the work cooperating with > partners. > From what we see one cannot say for sure that Mills has a high COP, at > least I can't, but what we don't see is unknown, the investors can be > gullible > or have done their due diligence outside the public light. We can only > wait and see and in the meantime Mills will have a great time. If you think > that > Mills is an empty bag of promises then why don't you challenge some of his > academic work, like the experiments leading to EUV spectra. Non > have step up and claimed that those results are wrong or have a credible > natural explanation (axil publish a paper if you want acceptance here). > This fact means that there is really a base of what he is doing and I > would say that the best a critic can do is to challenge what Mills is > publishing. > I would certainly change my perspective if negative facts about those > experiments came into light and i'm sure that those investors would too. > The critics are really way out of method to hurt Mills and he knows it and > have a ball because of it. Of cause if there is a high COP then > we all would benefit from it in the future and if not I won't feel sorry > for the investors. > > Regards > Stefan > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Note - that despite the crap-load of magnificent claims Mills has been >> making for months on the massive COP, he says in the vid that he has no >> data on the photovoltaic conversion end of it. What !?! >> >> >> >> Yet he wants to move it to market real quick. UNBELIEVABLE. >> >> >> >> He needs at least a year of performance data before moving to market, but >> he says there is presently none. This is most reminiscent of all those New >> Mexico licensees for the previous bogus invention (of a long line of bogus >> inventions) - that were supposed to be in production back in… when? Uh, >> like 8 years ago. >> >> >> >> >> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/11/blacklight-power-energy-f_n_150270.html >> >> >> >> Where does BLP find investors this gullible and patient? At least Rossi >> claims to have a year of performance data under his belt. If he does, he >> will have no competition from “the brilliant one.” >> >> >> >> *From:* Eric Walker >> >> Here is where a demo of the open device starts: >> >> >> >> https://youtu.be/R0PYe-4090g?t=53m13s >> >> >> >> Just prior to that, Mills says: "Now there's no microwave here. There's >> no high voltage. This is plasma being created in atmospheric pressures, >> that's filling that entire chamber. That is an enormous amount of power -- >> there's no energy source that can be responsible for that." >> >> >> >> No doubt we're to conclude that we're seeing the side-effects of >> Hydrinos. The video itself reminds me a little of ball lightning: >> >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning#/media/File:Great_Balls_of_Lightning.jpg >> >> >> >> One proposed explanation for ball lightning is that soil is vaporized by >> an arc discharge, in which case you'd have a dusty plasma. My suspicion is >> that that somehow induces beta decay in the dusty plasma, creating a >> self-sustaining ball of hot electrons and Cherenkov radiation. BrLP may >> have found a way to harness that kind of process, using a precursor such as >> potassium or silicon. >> >> >> >> In ball lightning, there's often reports of a sulfur smell. A source of >> the sulfur could be the following decays, starting with silicon: >> >> - >> - 32Si => 32P + e- + neutrino + 13 MeV >> - 32P => 32S + e- + neutrino + 1.7 MeV >> >> Eric >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Looks like they made a video available of their welder-sun demo. ;) >> >> >> >> See: >> >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0PYe-4090g >> >> >> > >
