dear Jed,

I am asking for permission to quote your message as  it is - in my blog now.
Thanks
Peter

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think this report is odd because --
>
> 1. As I said before, it should not take a year to test the machine. Any
> HVAC engineer can confirm it is producing heat in a few hours. Perhaps it
> takes a year to determine reliability, but as I said before, reliability is
> not an issue with a first-generation prototype machine. It is bound to be
> unreliable.
>
> 2. If someone was testing a machine for a whole year, they would be
> writing the report during that time and it would be ready as soon as the
> test ends. I do not see why it would take a month. Perhaps I am missing
> something. Perhaps I am thinking of how long it takes to prepare a manual
> for a new commercial product. (The manual better be ready when production
> begins, or you should fire your tech writer.)
>
> The Lugano report took a long time to write. As I recall they did not
> finish writing it until long after the test ended. That was symptomatic of
> their problems. I mean that the test was poorly done, and the report was
> poorly written, and both took far too long.
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to