dear Jed, I am asking for permission to quote your message as it is - in my blog now. Thanks Peter
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think this report is odd because -- > > 1. As I said before, it should not take a year to test the machine. Any > HVAC engineer can confirm it is producing heat in a few hours. Perhaps it > takes a year to determine reliability, but as I said before, reliability is > not an issue with a first-generation prototype machine. It is bound to be > unreliable. > > 2. If someone was testing a machine for a whole year, they would be > writing the report during that time and it would be ready as soon as the > test ends. I do not see why it would take a month. Perhaps I am missing > something. Perhaps I am thinking of how long it takes to prepare a manual > for a new commercial product. (The manual better be ready when production > begins, or you should fire your tech writer.) > > The Lugano report took a long time to write. As I recall they did not > finish writing it until long after the test ended. That was symptomatic of > their problems. I mean that the test was poorly done, and the report was > poorly written, and both took far too long. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
