What I remember, the power consumed by the E-Cat was to be compared to the
power consumed by the customers past boiler. The bill came from the
electric company.

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:20 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW, last December Rossi said on his blog that he was selling heat to the
> customer. For some reason this statement didn't seem to raise any eyebrows.
> It must mean the customer was not spending any money on energy to run the
> reactor and that Rossi could potentially sell the heat at a loss to keep
> the customer satisfied.
>
> Harry
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:52 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This report probably involves an audit as well.
>>
>> Harry
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think this report is odd because --
>>>
>>> 1. As I said before, it should not take a year to test the machine. Any
>>> HVAC engineer can confirm it is producing heat in a few hours. Perhaps it
>>> takes a year to determine reliability, but as I said before, reliability is
>>> not an issue with a first-generation prototype machine. It is bound to be
>>> unreliable.
>>>
>>> 2. If someone was testing a machine for a whole year, they would be
>>> writing the report during that time and it would be ready as soon as the
>>> test ends. I do not see why it would take a month. Perhaps I am missing
>>> something. Perhaps I am thinking of how long it takes to prepare a manual
>>> for a new commercial product. (The manual better be ready when production
>>> begins, or you should fire your tech writer.)
>>>
>>> The Lugano report took a long time to write. As I recall they did not
>>> finish writing it until long after the test ended. That was symptomatic of
>>> their problems. I mean that the test was poorly done, and the report was
>>> poorly written, and both took far too long.
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to