What I remember, the power consumed by the E-Cat was to be compared to the power consumed by the customers past boiler. The bill came from the electric company.
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 11:20 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW, last December Rossi said on his blog that he was selling heat to the > customer. For some reason this statement didn't seem to raise any eyebrows. > It must mean the customer was not spending any money on energy to run the > reactor and that Rossi could potentially sell the heat at a loss to keep > the customer satisfied. > > Harry > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:52 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> This report probably involves an audit as well. >> >> Harry >> >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I think this report is odd because -- >>> >>> 1. As I said before, it should not take a year to test the machine. Any >>> HVAC engineer can confirm it is producing heat in a few hours. Perhaps it >>> takes a year to determine reliability, but as I said before, reliability is >>> not an issue with a first-generation prototype machine. It is bound to be >>> unreliable. >>> >>> 2. If someone was testing a machine for a whole year, they would be >>> writing the report during that time and it would be ready as soon as the >>> test ends. I do not see why it would take a month. Perhaps I am missing >>> something. Perhaps I am thinking of how long it takes to prepare a manual >>> for a new commercial product. (The manual better be ready when production >>> begins, or you should fire your tech writer.) >>> >>> The Lugano report took a long time to write. As I recall they did not >>> finish writing it until long after the test ended. That was symptomatic of >>> their problems. I mean that the test was poorly done, and the report was >>> poorly written, and both took far too long. >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >> >
