Brad, I concur. Nobody talking here is a pseudo-skeptic. Every one of us who is skeptical here has devoted a large amount of time (and money for some of us) to reading, analyzing, thinking, and even directly conducting many experiments. I have wanted the E-cat to work as much as anyone, and understand how it is hard to give up that hope when you have invested so much in seeing it through to a positive outcome. But we can't let that cognitive dissonance cause us to continue down a path of waste when there may be other more fruitful avenues. Eventually, a person must say, "enough is enough" and realize a dream is just a dream and open our eyes to look around for something real and worth investing effort in. It is painful to do, but better than continuing down that path.
Jack On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:36 PM Brad Lowe <ecatbuil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wait for another inconclusive report written by a dunce or a paid > stooge? Rossi has wasted many man-years of our collective time. I am > done waiting. > > And don't call me a pseudo-skeptic. We all would have been happy with > any report where a gas generator ran the E-cat which heated a body of > water. With a 1MW output, he could run that in a day to prove his > claim and win back his millions. Rossi doesn't have anything of > commercial value. Time to admit Rossi's grandfatherly demeanor and > confident lies fooled me and many others. > > - Brad > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 1:05 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > > Brad Lowe wrote. "Goat-guy made a great comment on next big future > where he > > makes a very good guess as to how Rossi is faking the results of the > tests." > > > > Wait and see what the ERV report shows. > > > > I doesn't mater what the test it will not be enough to persuade pseudo > > skeptics. As Rossi said long ago, the only proof will be sales of > working > > reactors. > > > > > >
