Jed, everyone can have an opinion. My opinion is that there is no way to qualify the right answer or sort out anything of this mess - based on judging people's character. Why not wait for the report, which Rossi says is coming? IMHO it is remarkable that IH did not resolve the issue by negotiate with Rossi. IH are a professional investor and even if $11M is a lot of money measured with what most of us are used to - it is not that much of a deal for IH. They probably have similar size investment go bad now and then. That situation indicate that something is very wrong between IH and Rossi. It will be an answer to what is and what is not. >From what Rossi has committed to the next phase is commercialization of the Ecat. I do not think Rossi can sell this 250kW Ecat without having a test facility where the customer can make sure it is a sane investment. The good thing is that we will soon know. Why make risky judgment of character based on rumors / gossip / evil tongues.?
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > >> Thank you for proving my point (Skeptics will not believe any test) >> You have no idea what tests were run on the 1 MW plant by the EVR but you >> have already dismissed it sight unseen. >> > > But not without reason. Those of us who are familiar with the people and > the work of I.H. find them more credible than Rossi. When Rossi says the > test was positive, but I.H. says it was not, then sight unseen I will > assume I.H. is right. > > I would say the same if McKubre had examined the results and it was his > word against Rossi's. Some people have more credibility than others. > > This is not a scientific method of judging a result, but it is valid. > > - Jed > >
