>>>And if I were 'there', I'd too be calling for different testing.
You'd be calling for a lot more than that if you discovered that someone
was cheating you!
But asking for new testing is not part of the agreement which was signed.
There are several reasons why IH would want to default on the contract.
Maybe they didn't raise as much money as they had hoped. Maybe they did
find some reason to believe that they were being cheated. Maybe they've
come to distrust the ERV. But without the lawsuit, would they have
returned Rossi's intellectual property? Would they have signed the
patent back over to him?
If Rossi is a cheat, they should counter-sue and try to file criminal
charges. Otherwise, they should try to undo the damage they've done, by
taking Rossi's IP, and learning the skills to use this technique, which
they took from Rossi; and pay something for going through this one-year
test, which took time and effort.
Craig
On 04/10/2016 03:17 PM, Brad Lowe wrote:
And if I were 'there', I'd too be calling for different testing.
