On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Craig Haynie <cchayniepub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> IH had already paid Rossi $11.5 million, and Rossi had already given IH
>> his IP.
>>
>
> I.H. says the device does not work. Therefore the IP is worthless.
>

My point is that there were reasons, before the contract was signed, to
compel the other party to complete the agreement if the report came back
positive. Money and IP would have already been transferred.

Reply via email to