We will see soon enough. I'm hoping that the QuarkX test will give
positive results. If that happens it will alter the game. I gather
that you are on Jed's side that the E-Cat doesn't work. I don't
consider that proven.
On 6/4/2016 2:12 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:58 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
As I said, this is lawyer fodder. The Chief Justice once said
"The law is an ass" so anything might happen.
Perhaps. But the larger point is that Rossi is not acting upon a
realistic assessment of what lies within the realm of possibility.
Perhaps he sees himself as David to IH's Goliath. At least David was
a capable fighter. Rossi has chosen an inexperienced lawyer to do his
fighting. IH have sensibly hired a decent law firm. I have few doubts
as to which team will come out on top. The questions that will be
considered will be mind-numbingly banal ones, but ones that have legal
significance. Rossi deliberately chose this battle.
Rossi is obstinately proceeding forward within his own reality
distortion field, either oblivious to the difficulties he has brought
upon himself and that he is about to bring upon himself, or out of
some kind of self-destructive impulse. One might wonder, despite
hints from people with access to additional information that there is
evidence of deliberate fraud, whether beneath all of this distraction
Rossi actually has a working technology. If he has approached
technical questions with the same lack of attention to detail that he
has legal questions, the outlook is not promising. I do not see how
people can attach themselves with such vigor to the notion that Rossi
is in the right here and IH are in the wrong. People are not being
objective.
Eric
