On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:31 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
No. that is not what I said or meant. To repeat it, why wouldn't IH have > told the ERV that his proposal for instrumentation wouldn't be satisfactory > before the test started? IF they accepted it, it's no good complaining > later. > We don't have more than a vague clue what was said and by whom, sitting in the peanut gallery. Little can be gleaned about what IH said beyond the press release they provided, their reply yesterday. For example, IH might have told the ERV that his proposal for instrumentation wasn't satisfactory before the test started, and that IH didn't accept the test. If one has a taste for adventure, one entertain statements made by some people who are one step removed from IH. They have essentially said things to this effect. But they're not spokespersons for IH. Eric
