On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 7:00 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
What has become clear though is that the story about the ERV's report not > holding up to scrutiny being the reason for not paying is pure nonsense. > IH hadn't seen even seen the report and so couldn't possibly have known > what was in it, before dismissing it out of hand. > What about IH's not paying as a result of its not trusting the setup of the test, the qualifications of the ERV, and the content of the ERV's report is pure nonsense? Please explain. When did IH dismiss the ERV's report out of hand? What details are you aware of about the conversations that took place between IH and Leonardo? Would IH have had much confidence in the report if there was no genuine collaboration on the setup of the test? > Then comes the propaganda to try and justify their action, feeding stuff > to critics about how bad the report was. > What propaganda are you referring to? Eric
