If it is true that IH offered to pay Rossi a sum of money to the cancel the test then that implies IH considered Rossi's IP to be valuable at that time.
Harry On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 10:41 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Eric & Jed, > > Consider the time line > > Summer 2015 Rossi was offered a sum to cancel the test > Rossi's counter offer was to return the $11.5 million paid and cancel IH's > license. > Feb 18 test of a one megawatt heat plant completed > Apr 05 Rossi sues. Rossi et al v. Darden et al > May 15 date Penon report given to Rossi and D/IH (hard to pin down exact > date) > June 2 Leonardo Corp terminated license with IH > > So Rossi sued Darden before either party had received the Penon's report. > Rossi would not sue IH without getting a strong indication that IH were > not going to pay him > > As for IH then feeding critics propaganda about how Penon's report was > rubbish see Sifferkoll for names like Dewey Weaver (& possibly Jed) > >
