a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> It strikes me as highly unlikely that whoever chose the flow meter > (Penon?) would not talk to the manufacturer for advice on which model to > get. > Oh, I expect they did consult. Then they deliberately selected an instrument that gave the wrong answer. They selected several other instruments that also gave the wrong answers. Several people told them that, but they refused to fix the problems. I assume they did this to inflate the apparent excess heat. Defkalion did something similar when they deliberately induced backflow. As I said here before, if you read the manual for a flow meter, or any instrument, you will find ways to get the wrong answer. Any fool can do that. You need to think about this. This meter has the minimum flow rate written right there on the face plate. Anyone who looks at it, and then looks at the data, will see that it is wrong. It is blatantly, irrefutably, in-your-face OBVIOUS that this instrument will give the wrong answer. It took me about 10 seconds to figure this out, seeing only Rossi's data and bare-bones description. I told you here many times it was wrong. I saw that *the instant I read what kind of flow meter it was*, and how much it was supposedly measuring. It does not take a rocket scientist. So what are you saying? That no one noticed? That Rossi did not read the face plate?!? How could that be? Of course he knew! Of course they told him! Why wouldn't they? - Jed
