a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > > Don't you think it would be better to wait for proof? >
The proof is right there, in Exhibit 5. Penon never responded. If the statements were wrong, he would have pointed out the errors. > How do you know the flow meter (and all Dr. Penon's the other > instruments) were not send back for calibration? > I have inside information in this case. There is no need to send it back. It is working perfectly. No one disputes that. - Jed
