Stephen A. Lawrence <sa...@pobox.com> wrote:
> How accurate is the "0 bar" number believed to be? (I should probably > know this already from earlier discussion, but I don't; sorry.) > It is shown as "0.0 bar" in Rossi's data. In Exhibit 5, Murray assumed this was supposed to be barG (1 atm). I have heard rumors that the actual numbers shown on the gauge were higher. That's all I have heard. If it really was 0.0 bar or barG, it seems a little odd that they would record only 1 decimal digit of precision. I would make it at least 3 digits: 0.026 (or whatever). Maybe the instrument only shows 1 digit? The flow meter only shows the nearest 1,000 liters, meaning in only clicks over 36 times a day. That's a nutty choice for an instrument. It should measure thousands of units per day. - Jed
