Mixent makes a good point here. I read somewhere that UDH of was it rydberg matter is a frozen plasma. If the definition of a plasma is total charge separation, then UDH is a plasma. There is a positive core and a negative electron spin wave covering that core on the outside of this nanowire so UDH might well be a super dense plasma.
Once charged up with light energy, UDH needs an injection of just of a few photons to produce muons again. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:56 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to <bobcook39...@gmail.com>'s message of Mon, 23 Jan 2017 > 13:55:21 > -0800: > Hi, > [snip] > >Holmild’s laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser > source IMHO. > > > >Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”? > > > >As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem to > produce much plasma, if any, and I doubt a plasma would support the surface > reaction Holmild suggests.. > > > 532 nm = 2.331 eV. This is probably enough to ionize Rydberg Hydrogen, > depending > on the exact level. > The plasma will at least initially be dense, if the initial hydrogen is > dense, > simply because it doesn't have time to "explode". > > Quote from https://phys.org/news/2015-11-discovery-enable-portable- > particle.html > > "If you increase the plasma density enough, even a pipsqueak of a laser > pulse > can generate strong relativistic effects," Milchberg added. > > Note that they were using plasma densities 20 greater than normal. However > Holmlid is talking about densities a million times greater than normal > IIRC. > > I suspect this means that a deliberately "chirped" laser may not be needed. > If the accelerated protons attain GeV energies, then they are quite > capable of > creating a whole zoo of charged particles. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
