Hi Bob, you got me to thinking how to measure any changes in spin coupling or the how to detect a BEC in solid and so I began to wonder if measuring magnetic susceptibility in PdH and PdD would show anything. I found an interesting old paper by H C Jamieson and F D Manchester "The magnetic susceptibility of Pd, PdH and PdD between 4 and 300 K" 1972 J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 2 323 http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4608/2/2/023.
This was from back in the 70s so take it as you may. What I found interesting is in the beta phase of Pd (H) was tending to be diamagnetic (repels) and nearly independent of temperature. That would seem to indicate that the H are becoming spin aligned and could hint at the formation of a BEC system. I also see a trend that D is also heading towards diamagenetic (negative susceptibility) with increasing D loading. So does someone have a newer paper on the subject? On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:37 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > CD Sites— > > > > I have for some time been of the mind that nuclear potential energy tied > up in a lattice of coherent (entangled) particles is transfered to the > lattice electrons in the form of spin orbital momentum—phonic energy during > LENR. > > > > In the Pd system with D at high loading a small BEC of D nuclei could > form and then fuse to He g iven the correct conditions involving EM > coupling to link neutron and proton magnetic moments with magnetic moments > of the Pd lattice electrons. In this regard I consider it takes a > relatively strong local B field to accomplish the necessary coupling with > the neutron and proton making up a D nucleus. > > > > The BEC status of D’s within the lattice would allow their close approach > during a reaction forming a He nucleus. The potential energy released > would not result in energetic particles or EM radiation, but only phonic > (spin) energy spread across the entire lattice. > > > > With proper resonant coupling and many BEC within a single lattice a > larger, more energetic, reaction occurs releasing enough phonic energy to > destroy the lattice or to create a bosenova. > > > > The reactions suggested above seem to fit observations from Pd system LENR > testing IMHO. > > > > Bob Cook. > > > > > > *From: *CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> > *Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:49 PM > *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature > > > > I'm kind of late on this, but would spin conservation do what Ed Storm > asked? > > > > "However, why would only a few hydrons fuse leaving just enough unreacted > hydrons available to carry all the energy without it producing > > energetic radiation? I would expect occasionally,many hydrons would fuse > leaving too few unreacted hydrons so that the dissipated energy > > would have to be very energetic and easily detected." > > > > If I remember, Steve and Talbot Chubbs had proposed that bose band > states could distribute the energy over many nucleons > > in the band state. In a 1D kronig-penny model of a periodic potential, H > and D form bands and their band energy levels are separated by a > > 0.2eV, which means when 20MeV is spread across the band, the spectrum > would be 20MeV / (n * 0.2eV) where n are the number of hyrons > > making up the band. That's just back of the envelope using a 2D > kronig-penny period potential. And all of that photon energy spread over > > n-hydrons gets dumped right back into the lattice. Similar in a sense to > the Mossbauer effect. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2017/jun/12/ > superfluid-polaritons-seen-at-room-temperature > > > Superfluid polaritons seen at room temperature > > > > the polaritons behave like a fluid that can flow without friction around > obstacles, which were formed by using a laser to burn small holes in the > organic material. This is interpreted by the researchers as being a > signature of the superfluid behaviour. > > > > there might be some sort of link between a superfluid and a Bose–Einstein > condensate (BEC) – the latter being a state of matter in which all > constituent particles have condensed into a single quantum state. He was > proved right in 1995 when superfluidity was observed in BECs made from > ultracold atoms > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A Bose condinsate brings super radiance and super absorption into play. > These mechanisms produce concentration, storage, and amplification of low > level energy and goes as "N", the number of items in the condinsate. > > > > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> > wrote: > > Why is a Bose Condensate needed? Its a matter of size and energy. The > smaller the size of something we want to see the more energy it takes. > Using low energy radar you will never be able to read something as small as > this text. You need to go to UV energies to study atoms. Higher ionizing > energies are needed to study the nuclear forces. Really high energy > accelerator energies are required to look at subatomic particles. > > > > The common complaint physicists have with cold fusion is that the energy > levels are to low to induce any type of nuclear reaction. They never, > however, considered the energy levels of a large hundreds of atoms wide > condensed nano-particle. Its energy levels are quite low. Warm thermal > vibrations appear to the nano particle as a high energy excitation. This > again is a matter of its size. It's not cracks, or shrunken atoms at > work. It is the thermal excitation of a nano particle that yields the > required energy. > > > > Again the simulation induces a velocity of one million meters per second. > > > > Frank Z > > > > > > > > > > >
