Where? Does the superconductivity increase even if there is no excess heat?
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is research that shows superconductivity that increases in > proportion to hydrogen loading in LENR systems. > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:05 PM, CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Bob, you got me to thinking how to measure any changes in spin >> coupling or the how to detect a BEC in solid and so I began to wonder if >> measuring magnetic susceptibility in PdH and PdD would show anything. I >> found an interesting old paper by H C Jamieson and F D Manchester "The >> magnetic susceptibility of Pd, PdH and PdD between 4 and 300 K" 1972 J. >> Phys. F: Met. Phys. 2 323 http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4608/2/2/023. >> >> This was from back in the 70s so take it as you may. What I found >> interesting is in the beta phase of Pd (H) was tending to be diamagnetic >> (repels) and nearly independent of temperature. That would seem to >> indicate that the H are becoming spin aligned and could hint at the >> formation of a BEC system. I also see a trend that D is also heading >> towards diamagenetic (negative susceptibility) with increasing D loading. >> >> So does someone have a newer paper on the subject? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:37 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < >> bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> CD Sites— >>> >>> >>> >>> I have for some time been of the mind that nuclear potential energy tied >>> up in a lattice of coherent (entangled) particles is transfered to the >>> lattice electrons in the form of spin orbital momentum—phonic energy during >>> LENR. >>> >>> >>> >>> In the Pd system with D at high loading a small BEC of D nuclei could >>> form and then fuse to He g iven the correct conditions involving EM >>> coupling to link neutron and proton magnetic moments with magnetic moments >>> of the Pd lattice electrons. In this regard I consider it takes a >>> relatively strong local B field to accomplish the necessary coupling with >>> the neutron and proton making up a D nucleus. >>> >>> >>> >>> The BEC status of D’s within the lattice would allow their close >>> approach during a reaction forming a He nucleus. The potential energy >>> released would not result in energetic particles or EM radiation, but only >>> phonic (spin) energy spread across the entire lattice. >>> >>> >>> >>> With proper resonant coupling and many BEC within a single lattice a >>> larger, more energetic, reaction occurs releasing enough phonic energy to >>> destroy the lattice or to create a bosenova. >>> >>> >>> >>> The reactions suggested above seem to fit observations from Pd system >>> LENR testing IMHO. >>> >>> >>> >>> Bob Cook. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:49 PM >>> *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm kind of late on this, but would spin conservation do what Ed Storm >>> asked? >>> >>> >>> >>> "However, why would only a few hydrons fuse leaving just enough >>> unreacted hydrons available to carry all the energy without it producing >>> >>> energetic radiation? I would expect occasionally,many hydrons would fuse >>> leaving too few unreacted hydrons so that the dissipated energy >>> >>> would have to be very energetic and easily detected." >>> >>> >>> >>> If I remember, Steve and Talbot Chubbs had proposed that bose band >>> states could distribute the energy over many nucleons >>> >>> in the band state. In a 1D kronig-penny model of a periodic potential, >>> H and D form bands and their band energy levels are separated by a >>> >>> 0.2eV, which means when 20MeV is spread across the band, the spectrum >>> would be 20MeV / (n * 0.2eV) where n are the number of hyrons >>> >>> making up the band. That's just back of the envelope using a 2D >>> kronig-penny period potential. And all of that photon energy spread over >>> >>> n-hydrons gets dumped right back into the lattice. Similar in a sense >>> to the Mossbauer effect. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2017/jun/12/superfl >>> uid-polaritons-seen-at-room-temperature >>> >>> >>> Superfluid polaritons seen at room temperature >>> >>> >>> >>> the polaritons behave like a fluid that can flow without friction around >>> obstacles, which were formed by using a laser to burn small holes in the >>> organic material. This is interpreted by the researchers as being a >>> signature of the superfluid behaviour. >>> >>> >>> >>> there might be some sort of link between a superfluid and a >>> Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) – the latter being a state of matter in >>> which all constituent particles have condensed into a single quantum state. >>> He was proved right in 1995 when superfluidity was observed in BECs made >>> from ultracold atoms >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> A Bose condinsate brings super radiance and super absorption into play. >>> These mechanisms produce concentration, storage, and amplification of low >>> level energy and goes as "N", the number of items in the condinsate. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Why is a Bose Condensate needed? Its a matter of size and energy. The >>> smaller the size of something we want to see the more energy it takes. >>> Using low energy radar you will never be able to read something as small as >>> this text. You need to go to UV energies to study atoms. Higher ionizing >>> energies are needed to study the nuclear forces. Really high energy >>> accelerator energies are required to look at subatomic particles. >>> >>> >>> >>> The common complaint physicists have with cold fusion is that the energy >>> levels are to low to induce any type of nuclear reaction. They never, >>> however, considered the energy levels of a large hundreds of atoms wide >>> condensed nano-particle. Its energy levels are quite low. Warm thermal >>> vibrations appear to the nano particle as a high energy excitation. This >>> again is a matter of its size. It's not cracks, or shrunken atoms at >>> work. It is the thermal excitation of a nano particle that yields the >>> required energy. >>> >>> >>> >>> Again the simulation induces a velocity of one million meters per second. >>> >>> >>> >>> Frank Z >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
