To the best of my understanding, the LENR reaction is a two step process. First, the heat of the system must be turned into an amplified spin system. Then this spin system us TRIGGED by the application of a strong EMP pulse that could be either light as in a laser pulse or an electrostatic pulse as in a spark, This trigger uses the KERR effect to change the state of the system.
For more detail as follows: Magnetism usually produces photons that travel from one pole to another symmetrically. http://www.ece.neu.edu/fac-ece/nian/mom/img/How%20Magnets%20Work/magneticFieldLines1.gif Magnetism becomes special when those photons don’t make it back from the pole that it came from to the other pole. This type of magnetic field is called anisotropic or unbalanced. This type of magnetism produces particles inside the proton that messes up the inner working of the proton that keep it together. I cover this process of how the magnetic fields produced by heat become anisotropic in this post http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/04/14/symmetry-breaking-is-the-trigger-in-lenr-axil-axil/#comment-3256673715 and also http://www.e-catworld.com/2017/04/14/the-process-by-which-the-proton-decays-in-lenr-axil-axil/#comment-3276572289 When symmetries are broken, this process disrupts the physical laws that keep things working. But there are many other ways in which this special magnetic field can form including the formation of rare earth magnets. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_anisotropy On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Where? Does the superconductivity increase even if there is no excess > heat? > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is research that shows superconductivity that increases in >> proportion to hydrogen loading in LENR systems. >> >> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:05 PM, CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Bob, you got me to thinking how to measure any changes in spin >>> coupling or the how to detect a BEC in solid and so I began to wonder if >>> measuring magnetic susceptibility in PdH and PdD would show anything. I >>> found an interesting old paper by H C Jamieson and F D Manchester "The >>> magnetic susceptibility of Pd, PdH and PdD between 4 and 300 K" 1972 J. >>> Phys. F: Met. Phys. 2 323 http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4608/2/2/023. >>> >>> This was from back in the 70s so take it as you may. What I found >>> interesting is in the beta phase of Pd (H) was tending to be diamagnetic >>> (repels) and nearly independent of temperature. That would seem to >>> indicate that the H are becoming spin aligned and could hint at the >>> formation of a BEC system. I also see a trend that D is also heading >>> towards diamagenetic (negative susceptibility) with increasing D loading. >>> >>> So does someone have a newer paper on the subject? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 1:37 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < >>> bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> CD Sites— >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I have for some time been of the mind that nuclear potential energy >>>> tied up in a lattice of coherent (entangled) particles is transfered to the >>>> lattice electrons in the form of spin orbital momentum—phonic energy during >>>> LENR. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In the Pd system with D at high loading a small BEC of D nuclei could >>>> form and then fuse to He g iven the correct conditions involving EM >>>> coupling to link neutron and proton magnetic moments with magnetic moments >>>> of the Pd lattice electrons. In this regard I consider it takes a >>>> relatively strong local B field to accomplish the necessary coupling with >>>> the neutron and proton making up a D nucleus. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The BEC status of D’s within the lattice would allow their close >>>> approach during a reaction forming a He nucleus. The potential energy >>>> released would not result in energetic particles or EM radiation, but only >>>> phonic (spin) energy spread across the entire lattice. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> With proper resonant coupling and many BEC within a single lattice a >>>> larger, more energetic, reaction occurs releasing enough phonic energy to >>>> destroy the lattice or to create a bosenova. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The reactions suggested above seem to fit observations from Pd system >>>> LENR testing IMHO. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Bob Cook. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From: *CB Sites <cbsit...@gmail.com> >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:49 PM >>>> *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Bose Einstein Condensate formed at Room Temperature >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm kind of late on this, but would spin conservation do what Ed Storm >>>> asked? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "However, why would only a few hydrons fuse leaving just enough >>>> unreacted hydrons available to carry all the energy without it producing >>>> >>>> energetic radiation? I would expect occasionally,many hydrons would >>>> fuse leaving too few unreacted hydrons so that the dissipated energy >>>> >>>> would have to be very energetic and easily detected." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> If I remember, Steve and Talbot Chubbs had proposed that bose band >>>> states could distribute the energy over many nucleons >>>> >>>> in the band state. In a 1D kronig-penny model of a periodic potential, >>>> H and D form bands and their band energy levels are separated by a >>>> >>>> 0.2eV, which means when 20MeV is spread across the band, the spectrum >>>> would be 20MeV / (n * 0.2eV) where n are the number of hyrons >>>> >>>> making up the band. That's just back of the envelope using a 2D >>>> kronig-penny period potential. And all of that photon energy spread over >>>> >>>> n-hydrons gets dumped right back into the lattice. Similar in a sense >>>> to the Mossbauer effect. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2017/jun/12/superfl >>>> uid-polaritons-seen-at-room-temperature >>>> >>>> >>>> Superfluid polaritons seen at room temperature >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> the polaritons behave like a fluid that can flow without friction >>>> around obstacles, which were formed by using a laser to burn small holes in >>>> the organic material. This is interpreted by the researchers as being a >>>> signature of the superfluid behaviour. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> there might be some sort of link between a superfluid and a >>>> Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) – the latter being a state of matter in >>>> which all constituent particles have condensed into a single quantum state. >>>> He was proved right in 1995 when superfluidity was observed in BECs made >>>> from ultracold atoms >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> A Bose condinsate brings super radiance and super absorption into play. >>>> These mechanisms produce concentration, storage, and amplification of low >>>> level energy and goes as "N", the number of items in the condinsate. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Frank Znidarsic <fznidar...@aol.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Why is a Bose Condensate needed? Its a matter of size and energy. The >>>> smaller the size of something we want to see the more energy it takes. >>>> Using low energy radar you will never be able to read something as small as >>>> this text. You need to go to UV energies to study atoms. Higher ionizing >>>> energies are needed to study the nuclear forces. Really high energy >>>> accelerator energies are required to look at subatomic particles. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The common complaint physicists have with cold fusion is that the >>>> energy levels are to low to induce any type of nuclear reaction. They >>>> never, however, considered the energy levels of a large hundreds of atoms >>>> wide condensed nano-particle. Its energy levels are quite low. Warm >>>> thermal vibrations appear to the nano particle as a high energy >>>> excitation. This again is a matter of its size. It's not cracks, or >>>> shrunken atoms at work. It is the thermal excitation of a nano particle >>>> that yields the required energy. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Again the simulation induces a velocity of one million meters per >>>> second. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Frank Z >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
