On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Unless you took part in the lawyers' negotiations, you do not know that is > the reason. ***You don't have to be involved at that level. If the report was a slam dunk either way it would have compelled the outcome of the case. It wasn't a slam dunk for Rossi enough for him to move forward to get $89M and it wasn't a slam dunk enough for IH to keep in there.
However, I am sure the Penon report > is not "credible" in this universe according to our laws of physics. It was > a gross violation of thermodynamics, as Smith pointed out. Also because > Florida is not located in a vacuum in outer space. I am pretty sure of > that. ***If it was that much of a slamdunk, then IH would have ridden it all the way to the goal line. They didn't. > > Perhaps the people at I.H. worried that a jury might be as gullible as you > are, and the jury might think the Florida could be in a vacuum, because > what do those scientists know, anyway? ***Apparently those scientists are as arrogant as you are but they don't meet your 3rd grade qualification. They are a bunch of elitist > know-it-alls with their "laws" of "physics." They are so sure of > themselves, they think that when you take photo of a 15,000 pound machine > with pipes running to the ceiling, the image has to show up in the camera! ***Again, it should have been a slam dunk to hear you tell it. But it was NOT a slam dunk. > Why can't it be invisible??? Huh? You tell me! And it was equipped with an > anti-gravity machine which is why the mezzanine didn't collapse. You didn't > think of THAT, did you, Mr. Elite Scientist. ***You make it sound so simple. So much of a slam dunk. If it were that simple, that much of a slam dunk, IH wouldn't have settled. There is a huge duhh factor here that any third grader can see.
