In My 2012 EPRI on gas loading Nickel nanopowders I always saw continuing heating, but at levels below 200 milliwatts. I did not find any accelerant property. My attempts at dielectric discharges was terminated when I burned out the power supply and was introduced to Arthur Manelas
________________________________ From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 11:12 AM To: Vortex Subject: Re: [Vo]:LENR fission JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote: FAIL Apparently this is too an issue which is either not important or too technical for you. I looked at the few of these references and none of them mention COP wrt thermal feedback. As I said, that is because the COP is meaningless in cold fusion. However, as I also said, a thermal pulse often produces heat after death, with a COP of infinity. You can't ask for more enhancement than that! A lack of comprehension of the value of COP as an intuitive and accurate metric in LENR and the silly attempt to change its meaning is apparently guiding an uncharacteristic flood of disinformation… I do not see what is intuitive or accurate about a parameter that does not even exist in many experiments. Input power with electrolysis affects the formation of material, but it has nothing to do with the performance of the reaction itself. The reaction works with no input power during heat after death or with gas loading, so how can the ratio of input to output (the COP) be a critical parameter? I suggest you address that question rather than insulting top experts in this field such as Fleischmann, Storms and Miles. (They are the ones who say this, not me. Or not just me.) - Jed
