By Rossi's own standard he hasn't proven anything. ("The market will
decide")
Why do his defender's require a lower standard of proof than Rossi himself
?Harry On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:06 AM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Russ— > > > > As you point the baggage of negative feedback is great. It also carries a > signature on hopelessness, I would say. > > > > Bob Cook > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, March 18, 2018 2:16:34 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:LENR fission > > > At least Jed make the lines of credibility clear, either Rossi is a fraud > or Jed is. The jury is still out. If the E-Cat roars then I propose that > Jed do the honourable Japanese thing and commit internet seppuku and STFU. > > > > *From:* Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, March 17, 2018 6:53 PM > *To:* Vortex <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:LENR fission > > > > JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > > > In fact, his E-Cat system demands it. > > > > The E-Cat does not work. It is a fraud. > > > > > > Anyone who accepts the positive feedback modality should realize that it > comes with a lot of baggage. > > > > The data shows positive feedback. Anyone who rejects data is not doing > science. You have to accept what the experiments show. > > > > - Jed > > > > > > > > > > > > >
