Holmlid uses  a crystal frequency doubler (  1064 to 532 nm ) which
polarizes the laser light to a single handedness. The chirality of the EMF,
both fields and particles, are very important to the LENR reaction. The
strong force is a chiral force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_frequency_multiplier

https://formulatrix.com/protein-crystallization-systems/sonicc-protein-crystal-detection/how-it-works/

[image: image.png]



On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 6:32 PM JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

> Hi Robin,
>
>
>
>    - It violates conservation of charge unless one can simultaneously
>    flip the charge of an electron, which would be the equivalent of getting a
>    proton and an electron to swap charges.
>
>
>
> Hmmm… Perhaps that is exactly what happens on a transient basis. Some kind
> of double charge reversal occurs on irradiation -  which could be transient
> since the UDH hydrogen is very compact and annihilation would be almost
>  instantaneous.
>
>
>
> Consequently, one suspects that the Holmlid effect does not scale up well
> – but large size is not needed in this case since so many muons are
> produced per pulse and each will catalyze dozens of fusion reactions. He
> seems to be looking at a megawatt as the thermal capacity limit in a muon
> catalyzed fusion implementation.
>
>
>
> It could be possible that the frequency/wavelength of Holmlid’s laser  was
> a lucky choice and is somehow spatially resonant with a cluster of dense
> hydrogen. His  papers list the wavelength at 1064 or 532 nm so there is
> probably a frequency doubling feature. That wavelength would imply  a very
> large cluster of UDH if there was spatial resonance.
>
>
>
> The pulse energy is listed as miniscule - only .2J to .5J which works out
> to about e^18 coherent photons per pulse. This is incredibly low energy
> input -billions of times lower than a beamline - and  yet many muons
> appear, as if by magic. I hope he is correct on this because it would be
> the most important finding in LENR since the beginning, in 1989.
>
>
>
> Almost certainly there is a backdoor mechanism of some kind at work here.
> The  formation of antimatter via charge conjugation in dense hydrogen could
> be the best explanation.
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to