If what you propose is true then the production and/or the purification of metals by a customer of the ferrosilicon with this produce would be near impossible let along noticeable. The key to this issue is detection of this impurity in larges amount by the either the smelter or any of its customers over years of use. If you still believe that this improbable situation is true, then your resistance to the obvious situation is unshakable.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 5:39 PM <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 14 May 2019 00:34:05 -0400: > Hi, > >How about the hazard risks? > > Note the "human contact" from a previous post. When the material was > analyzed/used the Triiron dodecarbonyl would probably have dissociated > into Fe + > CO again, and the CO escaped as a gas, leaving just Fe & Si in the proper > proportions. > The CO would likely not have been noticed in a reasonably ventilated space. > > I'm far from certain that this scenario actually occurred, but it is a > possibility, and I think more a likely explanation than a transmutation > reaction > that produced no apparent energy. > > Note that 4.5 ton of CO converted to Si would yield an energy of over 56 > million > tons of TNT. This is about as much as the largest nuclear weapon ever > tested > (Soviet "Tsar Bombe"). Not very likely to have gone unnoticed on a daily > basis. > ;). > > > Note also that in a transmutation scenario, CO would need to have been > transmuted to both Fe & Si in just the right proportions to maintain the > correct > overall ratio of Fe-Si (1:3 by weight?). This would imply an extraordinary > degree of control over two different nuclear reactions that they didn't > even > know were happening. > > Furthermore, the reaction that they proposed to create the Fe used O18, > which is > only 0.2% of natural Oxygen, and though I haven't run the numbers, my gut > tells > me that there just wouldn't have been enough of it present in the input > materials. > > > > >Safety Information of Triiron dodecarbonyl (CAS NO.17685-52-8): > >Hazard Codes: [image: Flammable]F,[image: Harmful]Xn,[image: Toxic]T > > > >On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 9:00 PM <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > > > >> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 12 May 2019 20:28:44 -0400: > >> Hi, > >> [snip] > >> >The externally low Melting point?: ?165 °C (329 °F; 438 K) would seem > to > >> >me to be a dead give-a-way to the presence of 25% volume of Fe3(CO)12 > by > >> >weight. > >> > >> If the output from the reactor/furnace were cooled very rapidly, there > >> could > >> still be CO trapped inside that could form such crystals, where they > would > >> be > >> exposed to neither air nor human contact. > >> [snip] > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> Robin van Spaandonk > >> > >> local asymmetry = temporary success > >> > >> > Regards, > > > Robin van Spaandonk > > local asymmetry = temporary success > >
