In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sun, 12 May 2019 04:30:24 -0400: Hi, [snip]
I can't accept Kervran without reading at least one of his books. An English version would be preferable, but I'm not willing to pay over $100 for a copy. I tried buying a $20 version online, but they wouldn't ship to Australia. Would be happy to pay for cheap beaten-up English copy. As previously mentioned, the only way I could accept massive transmutation without an energy signature is if all the energy were removed by (anti-)neutrinos. His original experiment with chickens and eggs is easily explained if Calcium were leached from the chicken's bones to form egg shells. It can be replaced in the bones with Magnesium. Calcium phosphate (bones) is actually slightly stronger with a few percent Magnesium phosphate included. >Why doesn't a living organism burn up when that organism is transmuting >elements through nuclear fusion and/or fission? > >The LENR reaction will allow the energy and particles produced by >transmutation to escape to the far field while the LENR reaction is active. >This energy and particle product of transmutation will travel in a state of >quantum mechanical superposition thereby being in a state where this >destructive byproduct of the LENR reaction is unable to interact with >reality... i.e. the organism. When the LENR reaction terminates, the >transmuted element(s) will appear inside the organism in a stable and >quiescent state. The destructive byproduct of the LENR reaction will also >materialize into reality but the location of those particles and energy >will be far from their point of creation inside the organism. > >The general principle of superposition of quantum mechanics applies to the >states [that are theoretically possible without mutual interference or >contradiction] ... of any one dynamical system. It requires us to assume >that between these states there exist peculiar relationships such that >whenever the system is definitely in one state we can consider it as being >partly in each of two or more other states. The original state must be >regarded as the result of a kind of superposition of the two or more new >states, in a way that cannot be conceived on classical ideas. Any state may >be considered as the result of a superposition of two or more other states, >and indeed in an infinite number of ways. Conversely, any two or more >states may be superposed to give a new state... > >Atoms can be in two places at the same time >https://phys.org/news/2015-... ><https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2015-01-atoms.html%3AkO-kbhhrpqu6Nq4Cfpn-CExDSqA&cuid=2168707> > >[image: Thumbnail] ><https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2F3c1703fe8d.site.internapcdn.net%2Fnewman%2Fcsz%2Fnews%2F800%2F2015%2Fatomscanbein.jpg%3AnB5SGreRz5Yg1p4W8dyRQ3FU7TQ&cuid=2168707> > > >On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 3:39 AM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Fe(CO)5 is toxic, which is of concern because of its volatility (vapour >> pressure: 21 millimetres of mercury (2.8 kPa) at 20 °C). If inhaled >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inhale>, iron pentacarbonyl may cause lung >> irritation, toxic pneumonitis >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toxic_pneumonitis&action=edit&redlink=1>, >> or pulmonary edema <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulmonary_edema>. Like >> other metal carbonyls, Fe(CO)5 is flammable >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flammable>. It is, however, considerably >> less toxic than nickel tetracarbonyl >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nickel_tetracarbonyl>. >> >> In regards to occupational exposures to iron pentacarbonyl, the National >> Institute for Occupational Safety and Health >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institute_for_Occupational_Safety_and_Health> >> has >> set a recommended exposure limit >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recommended_exposure_limit> at 0.1 ppm >> (0.23 mg/m3) over an eight-hour time-weighted average, and a short-term >> exposure limit <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-term_exposure_limit> at >> 0.2 ppm (0.45 mg/m3).[14] >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_pentacarbonyl#cite_note-14> >> >> >> If Fe(CO)5 were present in the final product, the smelter would be >> required to warn the customer about its toxicity when handled, Remember, >> this iron pentacarbonyl is 25% of the product. >> >> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 12:58 AM <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: >> >>> In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 11 May 2019 23:40:53 -0400: >>> Hi, >>> [snip] >>> >The ferrosilicon chemistry >>> > >>> >https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/silicon-monoxide >>> > >>> >as per its reference as follows: >>> > >>> >Production of Ferroalloys >>> ><https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080969886000055> >>> > >>> >Rauf Hurman Eric, in Treatise on Process Metallurgy: Industrial Processes >>> ><https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780080969886>, 2014 >>> >1.10.4.7.2 Fundamental Aspects >>> > >>> [snip] >>> > >>> >Sorry, but the only chemically carbon bound compounds invoked with >>> >ferrosilicon >>> >chemistry is CO and SiC. >>> >>> Normally yes. However this may throw more light on the subject:- >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_carbonyl >>> >>> & >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triiron_dodecacarbonyl which is a solid. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> Robin van Spaandonk >>> >>> local asymmetry = temporary success >>> >>> Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success
