It is also hard to not see some parallels with our last experiments (2016) with TiH2, nickel sheets, and light.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:58 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Ha! The new and improved new wording is interesting in a semantic sense... > but get real... > > Of course it is the demon cold fusion, but now we can pivot around that > stigma and instead present it all in on a different geometry... very little > changes but the word salad. > > IOW it is the same old cold fusion (of P/F) that we know and lover ... no > substantial difference at all... but now we differentiate so that it is > very hot at the femtoscale and warm everywhere else... exactly like it has > been for the past 31 years when the perspective is the much larger > dimensional frame of reference. > > I think Larry Forsley must be getting a big laugh out of this :-) > > > > > On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 7:31:16 PM PDT, Jack Cole <jcol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > They are careful to say it's not CF. Sure seems like it originated in CF > methods. > > > https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/nuclear-fusiontokamak-not-included >
