This is just a variant of TRIBOLUMINESCENCE.
________________________________
From: H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2020 10:36 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Spacecraft of the Future Could Be Powered By Lattice 
Confinement Fusion


Remember 10-12 years ago the buzz around x-rays from peeling tape?
https://youtu.be/r63e5y3Z3R8<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2Fr63e5y3Z3R8&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5e07e211ec2e4ee2b01408d83a172f34%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637323218527191555&sdata=vdN24d5CZX2afFt0cSb0xBgiafTbtres2KHW7fJSvY8%3D&reserved=0>
If this way of generating x-rays could be harnessed it would make this lattice 
confinement fusion more economical.

Harry


On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 9:56 AM Jack Cole 
<jcol...@gmail.com<mailto:jcol...@gmail.com>> wrote:
It is also hard to not see some parallels with our last experiments (2016) with 
TiH2, nickel sheets, and light.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:58 PM Jones Beene 
<jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
Ha! The new and improved new wording is interesting in a semantic sense... but 
get real...

Of course it is the demon cold fusion, but now we can pivot around that stigma 
and instead present it all in on a different geometry... very little changes 
but the word salad.

IOW it is the same old cold fusion (of P/F) that we know and lover ... no 
substantial difference at all... but now we differentiate so that it is very 
hot at the femtoscale and warm everywhere else... exactly like it has been for 
the past 31 years when the perspective is the much larger dimensional frame of 
reference.

I think Larry Forsley must be getting a big laugh out of this  :-)




On Wednesday, August 5, 2020, 7:31:16 PM PDT, Jack Cole 
<jcol...@gmail.com<mailto:jcol...@gmail.com>> wrote:


They are careful to say it's not CF.  Sure seems like it originated in CF 
methods.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/nuclear-fusiontokamak-not-included<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fspectrum.ieee.org%2Fenergywise%2Fenergy%2Fnuclear%2Fnuclear-fusiontokamak-not-included&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5e07e211ec2e4ee2b01408d83a172f34%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637323218527201549&sdata=tFwolNCAbuvzmGNcwOKsaes7M9WV2mRrmrVRsvA2484%3D&reserved=0>

Reply via email to