The biggest crime is still ongoing.
Companies like Merck (+ vaccine makers) actively bribe CDD/FDA/WHO to
not allow *IVERMECTIN *for CoV-19 treatment. Now the USA state mafia
tops this and donates 1.2 billion to Merck for an already failed drug.
See statement of Dr. Kory: https://vimeo.com/562286662
With IVERMECTIN we would have only a few 1000 victims from CoV-19.
India currently only uses *IVERMECTIN.* India cases overall did go down
7x. Delhi that started early has now - after 7 weeks - about 131
cases/day far below USA level.
So you have to learn: Big Pharma does not hesitate to kill you with bad
drugs if they want to make money.
J.W.
On 16.06.2021 00:07, Michael Foster wrote:
I read a lot of scientific papers covering a broad variety of subjects. It's
how I amuse myself, even though I am not a scientist. Some people play golf, I
read scientific papers. I'm sure many of you on this list have noticed that
papers on research payed for with your tax dollars are not available to the the
public except through for-profit companies who will charge you an arm and a leg
for them. The companies that do this are literally making billions doing this.
Nice, huh?
I can often dodge the pay wall by searching for one of the authors who may have
published a paper on the same subject somewhere else. Why should I or anyone
else have to pay to read about research that I and other taxpayers have already
bought?
Given the state of the world today, I was reading a lot of papers on PubMed,
the NIH website, where you could read literally thousands of papers covering
medical research. Only about a week ago, I read one that was the most
horrifying evidence of collusion between our benevolent government and Big
Pharma. I was going to post the conclusion and summary of this research here
for all of you to read and a link to the paper. Guess what? That paper has
vanished and you can now only read abstracts of the papers on PubMed. You now
must go the usual private company and pay to read research available for free
only days ago. I unfortunately didn't save the link or the whole PDF because I
thought I could find it again with a few key words as I had before. All gone.
I will give you what I remember to the best of my ability the summary and
conclusion of the research in question. It stated flatly through two double
blind clinical trials that those suffering from HIV/AIDS could have their
immune function restored by taking n-acetyl cysteine, an inexpensive and easily
obtained supplement. The effect was raising the glutathione levels in the body.
Glutathione is the master anti-oxidant in the human body. You could say that
glutathione IS the immune system.
What I'm saying is that this sort of information while formerly available to
anyone looking for it and the ability to understand it, was not likely to
attract attention, given the type of specialist study that it was. So, for lack
of informing the general public of this research, HIV sufferers are paying
nearly $120 per day for medication from Big Pharma versus a few cents per day
for the n-acetyl cysteine.
I don't know about you guys, but I would call that a crime.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06