Unintended consequences https://www.wfla.com/community/health/coronavirus/ivermectin-causes-sterilization-in-85-percent-of-men-study-finds/
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 6:21 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <[email protected]> wrote: > The biggest crime is still ongoing. > > Companies like Merck (+ vaccine makers) actively bribe CDD/FDA/WHO to not > allow *IVERMECTIN *for CoV-19 treatment. Now the USA state mafia tops > this and donates 1.2 billion to Merck for an already failed drug. > > See statement of Dr. Kory: https://vimeo.com/562286662 > > > With IVERMECTIN we would have only a few 1000 victims from CoV-19. > > India currently only uses *IVERMECTIN.* India cases overall did go down > 7x. Delhi that started early has now - after 7 weeks - about 131 cases/day > far below USA level. > > So you have to learn: Big Pharma does not hesitate to kill you with bad > drugs if they want to make money. > > > J.W. > On 16.06.2021 00:07, Michael Foster wrote: > > I read a lot of scientific papers covering a broad variety of subjects. It's > how I amuse myself, even though I am not a scientist. Some people play golf, > I read scientific papers. I'm sure many of you on this list have noticed > that papers on research payed for with your tax dollars are not available to > the the public except through for-profit companies who will charge you an arm > and a leg for them. The companies that do this are literally making billions > doing this. Nice, huh? > > I can often dodge the pay wall by searching for one of the authors who may > have published a paper on the same subject somewhere else. Why should I or > anyone else have to pay to read about research that I and other taxpayers > have already bought? > > Given the state of the world today, I was reading a lot of papers on PubMed, > the NIH website, where you could read literally thousands of papers covering > medical research. Only about a week ago, I read one that was the most > horrifying evidence of collusion between our benevolent government and Big > Pharma. I was going to post the conclusion and summary of this research here > for all of you to read and a link to the paper. Guess what? That paper has > vanished and you can now only read abstracts of the papers on PubMed. You now > must go the usual private company and pay to read research available for free > only days ago. I unfortunately didn't save the link or the whole PDF because > I thought I could find it again with a few key words as I had before. All > gone. > > I will give you what I remember to the best of my ability the summary and > conclusion of the research in question. It stated flatly through two double > blind clinical trials that those suffering from HIV/AIDS could have their > immune function restored by taking n-acetyl cysteine, an inexpensive and > easily obtained supplement. The effect was raising the glutathione levels in > the body. Glutathione is the master anti-oxidant in the human body. You could > say that glutathione IS the immune system. > > What I'm saying is that this sort of information while formerly available to > anyone looking for it and the ability to understand it, was not likely to > attract attention, given the type of specialist study that it was. So, for > lack of informing the general public of this research, HIV sufferers are > paying nearly $120 per day for medication from Big Pharma versus a few cents > per day for the n-acetyl cysteine. > > I don't know about you guys, but I would call that a crime. > > > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
